SO the Scottish Government is not being allowed to hold a referendum on Scottish independence. This process has been refused by the leader of the Conservative Party, which has just been fined £70,000 for alleged electoral fraud, sorry “maladministration” (“Treasurer faces probe as Tories are fined £70,000”, The Herald, March 17)
The cost to the taxpayer for this investigation will be considerable – 16 police forces still working on inquiries and more individual Members of Parliament still under scrutiny. Will we ever hear what the overall figure is to date, or will that be buried in a future inquiry lasting a year or two?
This flawed electoral process has perhaps denied other potential MPs their rightful place in Westminster. As one of them is Nigel Farage we might not have heard the end of this.
It also appears to have enraged some individual Conservative MPs who are being investigated by police and who have complained of being abandoned by Central Office.
The Conservative Party political hubris that has been on display throughout the entire process of leaving the European Union may well come back to haunt it. The practice of sniping at your opponents when you feel that you are in control, has a horrible habit of rebounding on you when you are in a vulnerable position.
But to return to the question of the Scottish referendum on independence; even opponents of the referendum like Peter Mandelson acknowledge the justice of the case. Theresa May has refused to consider any of the key proposals by the Scottish Government paper on Scottish access to the European Market and free movement of people.
It does seem curious that the Prime Minister felt the need to make a statement about the Scottish Referendum on independence when the Scottish Parliament is due to debate this next week.
Can it be that there is a Westminster effort to distract media attention from matters closer to home?
Dhevaraj Chetty,
36 Woodend Drive, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here