WHEN it was launched last year, the aim of the Scottish Government’s Pupil Equity Fund was clear. The £120m available was to be targeted at primary pupils from poorer backgrounds and allocated directly to schools where the headteachers would decide how to spend the money. The aim was to close the attainment gap, with teachers making the decisions.
At the time, the scheme was broadly welcomed, although there was also recognition that the money could not be, on its own, a solution for such a profound problem. Just a few days ago, the persistence of the problem was revealed by the latest school league tables - at the top are councils such as East Renfrewshire, where 66 per cent of pupils go on to higher education, while in Clackmannanshire, the figure is 25 per cent – all in a system that purports to offer broad equality.
READ MORE: North Lanarkshire Council is accused of 'emotional blackmail' in plan to raid Pupil Equity Fund
The Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) was a welcome attempt to change those figures, but it would appear that in one council area at least, the principles of the scheme are at risk. According to an email sent to its primary headteachers last week, North Lanarkshire Council would like to slice £1.3m from the £8.8m PEF money allocated to the area and use the money instead to pay for existing classroom assistants and an administrative team at the council’s HQ.
The move has been rightly criticised by the Association of Headteachers and Deputes Scotland whose general secretary Greg Dempster has said that the North Lanarkshire proposal is at odds with the conditions attached to the PEF money. The entire idea was that heads would decide how the money was spent based on the sound principle that, where possible, decisions should be made at school level where staff are aware of the pressing issues and problems. Headteachers should consult with councils of course, but North Lanarkshire should not be allowed to undermine the general principle.
The proposal to slice off 15 per cent of the PEF money also flouts the promise made at the start of the scheme that the new money would pay for activities in addition to those that were already planned. What North Lanarkshire proposes to do is use the money to fund existing services, in particular classroom assistants, which to some extent is understandable - many schools in more deprived areas have more than their fair share of pupils who require learning support, making classroom assistants a vital resource. It also raises the question, once again, of whether the Government - initiatives such as PEF aside - is giving schools the overall funds they need.
READ MORE: North Lanarkshire Council is accused of 'emotional blackmail' in plan to raid Pupil Equity Fund
However, the act of robbing Peter to pay Paul proposed by North Lanarkshire is not the answer. A range of policies, of which PEF is just one part, will be needed to close the attainment gap in primary schools, but the solutions will have to be driven by headteachers and their teams. The Pupil Equity Fund specifically recognized this principle by promising a serious, targeted attempt to tackle the gap, with the decisions made on the ground. North Lanarkshire Council, or any other council for that matter, should not be allowed to undermine the good work before it has even begun.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here