COULD restorative justice play a bigger role in Scotland?
The practice of confronting offenders with the consequences of their crimes – often but not always by giving victims the chance to meet those who have wronged them – is not a new one. Evidence shows the method can have a useful impact on reoffending while giving victims of crime a sense of having been heard and had a direct impact within the justice system.
But experts say that services are patchy at best, with only a handful of local authorities offering RJ services, and even then in a limited range of cases, usually offering it only for minor crimes, and sometimes with young people.
I have personal experience of this – a decade ago I was invited along as a “victim” of crime by police in Lockerbie, after a gang of bored youths broke into my grandfather’s house and swiped the contents of his wine cupboard. Meeting one of those responsible as a family “representative” it was not a wholly satisfactory experience.
I was confronted by a boy of about 12, who was far from the ring-leader of the gang of mates who had spent an afternoon getting drunk in the woods as a result. Explaining our sense of violation and the fact that it had added to upset following my Grandpa’s recently death, I made him cry. He seemed devastated and I got the impression I couldn’t make him feel worse than his mother had already done. I’m not sure what it achieved bar a tick in the box of some police paperwork.
Tonight, academics from several UK universities will launch a series of meetings to argue that restorative justice could play a much more significant role in Scotland, including with more serious offenders.
Led by Edinburgh University’s Dr Steve Kirkwood they are to look at how it is used effectively in other countries the barriers to using it more widely, such as in cases of sexual violence and revenge porn, building up to a major event in the Autumn.
One personal experience is obviously pretty limited, but for what it’s worth I support the approach. But only if victims can have an impact on the people genuinely responsible, rather than already contrite children who just happened to be there.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here