Way back when the first independence referendum was just a twinkle in Alex Salmond's eye, one of The Herald's editors asked me to get my head around Quebec. How, he asked, did the province - or rather "the nation within Canada" - fare after two big votes on its constitution?
So I did what we reporters do when we we are lost: I asked a colleague in Montreal who I needed to call to get up to speed. "Do you want sovereigntist experts or federalist ones?" he asked, using the Quebec terms for those for and against the nation's independence. "Just 'expert' experts," I replied. "We don't have any of those," he laughed.
More than a quarter of a century after the last of two referendums, Quebeckers, even the clever ones at universities, remain pretty divided on partisan lines.
As Scotland heads for a potential second big vote, we should have a bit of a think about what we expect from our academics and how want them to behave. Why? Because brainy people, social media has revealed, are just as prone to spittle-spraying referendum-related tribalism as the rest of us.
Former Tory minister Michael Gove during last year's Brexit campaign said people had "had enough of experts". Me? I have had enough of experts being angry weirdos on Twitter, Facebook and blogs.
Michael Gove
I have taken to thinking of these often zealous academic hyper-partisans as "the nutty professors". Their common denominator: a reckless disregard for the kind of evidence-based rational thinking we all tend to associated with what we newspaper people tend to call "boffins".
A few of these unhappy souls have made it in to the newspapers. Some may be vulnerable - an academic is as capable as anyone else of showing signs of instability online. So I don't think it would be fair to name check them in the press again. However, I do feel the need to point out that the "nutty professors" are on both sides of the Scottish constitutional divide.
But we should universities do about this? They can have no problem, after all, with academic freedom of expression. And there is nothing wrong with researchers or teachers having views. Back in 2014 there were Academics for Yes and Academics Together. And they both played a not unimportant role in the debate.
The people whose job it is to defend the reputations of Scottish higher learning happily admit - off the record, of course - to monitoring the social media output and public pronouncements of their staff.
Journalists also have an issue here too. Do we discount the views of an expert just because they are - or have been - angrily partisan, perhaps online. Scotland now - thanks to the Centre on Constitutional Change or CCC at Edinburgh - has real intellectual backbone to its debates on independence, devolution and Brexit. Each side, unionists and nationalists, will claim it has the best experts. But even the CCC cannot have all the answers. Because nobody does. I am no PR man. But I have one bit of advice for academics when they venture in to public debates: sure, be partisan, but try not to look too thick doing so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel