A very happy birthday to all of you who give us this fabulous paper. Love it and long may you celebrate many more birthdays.
Noirin Blackie
Haddington
Many happy returns on the Sunday Herald’s 18th birthday (The 18-year-old life a of paper that defines modern Scotland, Sunday Herald at 18 supplement, February 26). Editor Neil Mackay wrote: “And so we became the only paper in Scotland – or the world for that matter (apart from Catalonia, I guess) which supported Scottish independence."
That is not strictly true. In November 1926, a group of nationalists, members of the Scots National League, launched the Scots Independent Newspaper. This was before the formation of the Scottish National Party, and was in fact a conduit for the merging of the Scottish Party and the National Party of Scotland to become the Scottish National Party. I personally had never heard of the paper until I joined the SNP in Peterhead in 1966. Previous contributors to the paper were Compton MacKenzie, Robert Bontine Cunninghame Grahame and Christopher Grieve (Hugh MacDiarmid); they were all before my time, but Mike Grieve, the latter’s son, was editor in 1966.
The paper – owned jointly by the SNP and the Scottish Secretariat – cost the SNP a lot of money (and aggro), and it became a private limited company in 1957. It is neither owned nor controlled by the SNP, but it has supported Scottish independence all its days. When I joined the SNP it was a weekly, and every SNP branch took copies. At present it is monthly and celebrated its 90th birthday at a lunch in Perth in November 2016.
As a former temporary editor of the paper (for three months from November 2005 until January 2016 – how time flies), I was over the moon when the Sunday Herald came out for Yes and I still have that front page. I was even more ecstatic when the Herald group produced The National.
One of the pithy sayings of the late Oliver Brown was: “All a man needs in life is a good cause and the enmity of the Glasgow Herald, and you can be assured if he has the first then the second will automatically follow.” Perhaps we should amend that to say “the Scotsman”.
Jim Lynch
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here