THE NHS – in Scotland as elsewhere in the UK – is all too aware of the continuing mismatch between patient expectations and what the service is actually able to provide. Further painful evidence of this widening gap emerged yesterday.
New figures show that patients in Scotland are having to wait longer than ever for treatment, key diagnostic tests and outpatient appointments. The figures do not make palatable reading and most of our health boards are failing to meet key targets. The Scottish Government has exerted pressure on them to strive to eliminate waits in excess of 16 weeks. It all brings to mind an evocative phrase uttered last September by the president of the Royal College of Surgeons – that the NHS was missing so many of its key performance targets that it had entered “the perpetual winter of Narnia”.
We must, however, bear in mind the words of Simon Barker, chairman of the BMA’s Scottish Consultants Committee, that the Scottish NHS’s deteriorating resources are being stretched – by an ageing population, by new technologies in drugs and healthcare and by the growing number of patients who, equipped with the results of their Google searches, know precisely what treatments are available to them.
Encouragingly, the Scottish Government has announced a programme of investment and reform to reshape the delivery of care and improve NHS performance. More resources will be channelled in the direction of social care and community care, the aim being to keeping people healthy at home for as long as possible. Yet does more need to be done? The report, Realising Realistic Medicine, by Dr Catherine Calderwood, the Chief Medical Officer, which is laden with insights that are worth pursuing, might be an excellent place to start.
Mr Barker raises a telling point, though. Which would we rather see? Increased healthcare investment to meet demand, or a more limited, more selective, NHS? It is an unappetising choice, but it is a question that must be debated as a matter of urgency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel