WHEN the SNP began its first term in government 10 years ago, it promised it would always keep 1000 more police officers than it had inherited. The 1000 threshold was a keystone pledge in the new government’s policy on justice and for years the justice secretary Kenny MacAskill said the extra officers had helped to reduce crime.
A decade on and it all looks rather different. As part of its new 10-year plan, Police Scotland has revealed officer numbers are to be cut by 400. There will be no immediate effect, but the level of recruitment will start to slow from 2018 onwards, thereby signalling the end of one of the Government’s most high-profile policies.
The theory is that by moving officers from backroom to frontline, there will be no effect on operational capacity, although it will be always be hard to see a cut in numbers in a positive light. The decision also comes at a fraught time for the police service in Scotland following the resignation of Moi Ali from the Scottish Police Authority over claims she was being silenced, and the continuing crisis of the £188m funding gap.
In recent months, the chief constable Phil Gormley has also been pointing out how workloads are changing. Increasingly, with dementia taking hold in Scotland, officers are dealing much more with vulnerable elderly people. The increase in cyber crime is also a profound change in what is required of the police.
In the face of all these changes, Police Scotland needs to consider what the service should look like in years to come and it can now do so free of the Government’s promise on officer numbers, which was always focused more on populism than the realities on the ground.
Frontline services will need to be protected, but the force may have to look at involving civilian staff much more in areas traditionally handled by officers. We also have to ask whether new forms of crime have to take priority over some of the incidents that have traditionally taken officers’ attention. When the nature of crime changes, the country’s police service needs to change too.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel