IT'S not too often on social media that hardline unionists and nationalists find themselves on a similar page, but last week's surprise news about the creation of a standalone BBC Scotland TV channel was one of those times.
For those on the most hardcore fringes, this is either evidence of the BBC capitulating to the SNP's political agenda or proof of a secret unionist plot to launch an anti-independence propaganda machine ahead of any possible indyref 2. Both sides, it seems, are readying excuses for defeat before the starting gun has even been fired.
Among everyone else, though, the news was broadly welcomed along with a healthy dollop of caution. A new Scottish TV channel capable of nurturing talent and truly reflecting the country's diversity is a massive step in the right direction.
We began the week with leaks indicating that hopes of a Scottish Six, an hourly news programme from Scotland to replace the current main UK bulletin, had been shelved by the BBC. Just as we were getting ready to throw in the towel on the idea of a better service in Scotland, it turned out director-general Tony Hall had an ace up his sleeve: Scotland will get its own TV channel in 2018.
Funded to the tune of £30m – the equivalent of BBC Four – it will create 80 new jobs in Scotland. While there won’t be a Scottish Six on BBC One – yet – there will be an hour-long 9pm bulletin on the new channel.
The investment in journalism and other areas of broadcast that this development brings is much needed. Scotland's news landscape has not adequately evolved alongside devolution. Rather, it has declined during the most exciting period in modern Scottish political history, and it’s this point in particular that has been the most controversial for the BBC.
So it’s important to acknowledge that this investment from the BBC is akin to an admission of liability: the broadcaster has been long criticised for its failure to develop services in Scotland, and it came to the boil in the two years preceding the independence referendum when voting members of the public were insulted time and again by a news structure broadly controlled by a London that had no sense of what was happening here.
Many had never really questioned the structures of our media before. It hadn't occurred to them that a news agenda dominated by London was harming Scotland’s interests. They hadn't been aware of how little investment there actually was in Scotland's potential.
That political and cultural realisation gave rise to a deep anger, which culminated in protests outside BBC Scotland's headquarters in Glasgow. Some of the rhetoric was confused and chaotic: the narrative of a deliberate BBC bias went too far, and claims that the BBC alone cost Scotland a Yes vote became a scapegoat for some activists.
That confused, boiling anger enabled opposition voices to try and label Scotland's independence movement as paranoid and controlling, rather than address legitimate concerns about the root problems in the media.
Such a substantial investment into BBC Scotland serves as vindication for the critics who were so unfairly smeared amid political campaigning. The BBC was failing to meet Scotland’s needs, and it shouldn’t be forgotten that even with this investment Scotland still lags behind levels in Wales and Northern Ireland.
The story doesn't end here. Scotland has changed, and scraps from the table will not satisfy the appetite of an ambitious people who've suddenly realised their worth. This concession from the BBC should serve as fresh motivation for campaigners who want a better media in Scotland.
Sure, this is a good start, but it must be well funded and well resourced, and decisions about commissioning and programming must be made in Scotland, not London. Anything less is not acceptable any more. Already, Scottish culture secretary Fiona Hyslop has pointed out that the Scottish Broadcasting Commission in 2009 estimated a Scottish TV channel would require more than double the amount of funding the BBC has allocated to its new offering.
But still, we are heading towards a Scotland with an existing broadcaster, STV, and a beefed up BBC Scotland offering, which will be competing with each other. There is huge potential in an exciting, vibrant broadcast landscape and a Scotland ready and willing to get creative with it.
But most of that groundwork won't be seen anywhere near social media channels, where, sadly, debate on broadcast will likely continue to be stunted along constitutional lines, and hurled back and forth between the extreme fringes as evidence of the other's deviousness. Let’s just leave them to it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel