Economist
Born: August 23, 1921;
Died: February 21, 2017
KENNETH Arrow, who has died aged 95, was a hugely respected Nobel prize-winning economist whose theories on risk, innovation and the basic mathematics of markets influenced thinking on everything from voting to health insurance and high finance.
He was most famous for his Impossibility Theorem, which sought to prove that collective decision making could never produce a result that respected everyone's preferences - a theory particularly relevant in the aftermath of the election of Donald Trump and Brexit.
With the British economist Sir John Hicks, Arrow won the 1972 Nobel memorial prize in economic science for their pioneering mathematical work on general equilibrium theory, which says there is an overall balance between supply and demand in an economy as a whole. Their mathematical models dealt with the factors involved, such as when and where a product is sold.
Born in New York to Romanian Jewish parents, Arrow studied for a degree in mathematics at the City College of New York before serving in the US Army Air Corps during the Second World War.
In 1949, he was appointed assistant professor of economics at Stanford University where he spent most of his career, although he also taught for 11 years at Harvard. He was also known as a mentor and five of his former students went on to become Nobel winners.
He came to international prominence in 1951 with his book, Social Choice and Individual Values, which used mathematical logic to discuss collective decision-making. His theorem was that it was impossible for a majority-rule voting system to be free of certain flaws.
"You can say, 'There's no really good way to run an election', but it is something else to prove it," fellow economics laureate Robert Aumann said of the theory. "It's like proving a bicycle cannot be stable."
Arrow also looked at how risk aversion, innovation and information affect the economy.
In a 1963 paper he confronted problems with the economics of medical care and health insurance, arguing that it is not a truly price-competitive situation because among other things the buyer - the patient - has much less information than the doctor - the seller - about necessary treatment and options. The issue is known in economics as asymmetric information and has been used to argue against introducing market forces in medical care.
Arrow's work had many other real-world applications. According to Paul Samuelson, the first American to win the Nobel economics prize, the economics of insurance, medical care, prescription drug testing, and the stock market could never be the same after Arrow.
Arrow won many awards during his long career, including the 2004 National Medal of Science, America's highest scientific honour, presented to him by then president George Bush.
Several other members of the family became economics professors and his nephew, Lawrence Summers, is a former Harvard University economics professor, Harvard president, and US Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton and adviser to Barack Obama.
Away from economics, Arrow was interested in music, Chinese art and even whales.
His son David said: "I think in his academic career, when people talk about it, it often sounds like numbers and probabilities. But a large focus of his work was how people matter.
"The fact that people often don't behave rationally ... that was one aspect that he often looked at, how it affected the lives of the people."
In addition to his son, Mr Arrow is survived by another son Andrew, a sister, Anita Summers, and a grandson.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here