REGARDING the new proposed changes to business rates in Scotland (“Mackay bows to rates hike fears with £45m package”, The Herald, February 22) perhaps people may not be aware that owners of empty industrial properties are now subject to pay 90 per cent of the rates on these properties. Owners are vainly trying to lease their properties and many have been lying empty for years.
Previously, empty properties with no earnings were subject to full rates relief.
Nowadays, in some cases, owners are now having to pay many thousands of pounds in rates with no revenue coming in. Many of these properties will be subject to bank mortgages and so on having to be paid. To overcome this new financial burden, some owners have been forced to demolish properties, therefore denying any future business occupier. This situation will surely hinder any growth for business in Scotland. No new factories will be constructed unless a guaranteed tenant is in place.
While the new small business relief is welcome, it leaves a ridiculous situation that, for instance, four or five small units employing many persons are paying no rates whatsoever, while across the road a large empty property is paying an extortion amount in rates with no income coming in.
How can this charge on empty properties be justified?
Matthew T Sneddon,
2 Campsie Drive, Bearsden.
LIVERPOOL Council is encouraging its citizens to earn a rates amnesty by informing on dog fouling - an odd relationship perhaps. However, I am expecting to have to pay nearly £500 more this year to East Dunbartonshire Council for the privilege of living in my own house, retired with no claim on schools or social services and with potholes taking second place to bicycle paths. So I am with Liverpudlians in seeing a connection between household rates and being dumped on.
John Dunlop,
9 Birnam Crescent, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel