THE planet is now in a precarious state with countries bristling with arms posturing for global recognition.
The United States of America, which boasts a Bureau of Tobacco, Alcohol and Firearms, is responsible for the majority of weapon sales to the rest of the world. It is this bureau which monitors the sales in the US of such substances and weapons which eventually lead to death if abused. The United Kingdom comes second in this deplorable trade followed by several European Union countries.
The world is awash with non-nuclear arms. There is no guarantee that once sold, weapons would not get into the wrong hands - the state of war in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other less advertised war zones is proof of this.
To profit out of arms sales is to indulge in a nefarious but obviously lucrative trade which should prick the consciences of all who are involved.
It was Mikhail Kalashnikov who having invented the AK-47 assault rifle with few moving parts remarked later that he wished he had not provided the world with this weapon as it had been developed to protect the Motherland – Russia. He had come to realise that it had become the weapon of choice of terrorist groups, being easily copied.
The mayhem caused by this evil trade disrupts the lives of those living in the war zones. Families are destroyed; the refugee crisis escalates while the leaders of the world, complicit in the arms trade just wring their hands. It is the Red Cross, Medecin sans Frontieres and other charities who supply the help – help which these charities can only afford through the donations provided by their supporters rich and poor. Amnesty International aims to prick the conscience of the world in attempt to get hypocritical leaders to look at the folly of their ways.
They who live by the sword will perish by the sword – “O that man the world o'er would brothers be for all that”.
Denis A Nicol,
Barcaldine, Strathearn Terrace, Crieff, Perthshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here