LAST year, in the light of increased devolution, the director general of the BBC Tony Hall ordered a review of the corporation’s news coverage in Scotland, including the idea of a dedicated Scottish Six O’Clock News. Whatever happened, he said, changes would be made to create a stronger BBC Scotland and it seemed like recognition that when a country changes profoundly, its institutions must change too.
So if, as expected, Tony Hall tells MSPs on Thursday that there will be no Scottish Six, it will be a frustrating and disappointing end to the process and a lost opportunity to fix a system that has not been fit for purpose for some time. Currently, the network news is shown from London at 6pm with Reporting Scotland following at 6.30pm, but increased devolution means the 6pm programme can often lead with stories that have no bearing on Scotland, particularly if they are about education or health. There is also very little scope to present a major UK story from a Scottish perspective.
A new 6pm programme with BBC Scotland deciding the running order made up of Scottish, UK and international news stories was the obvious solution, although it would not have been free of problems. The corporation would have needed to keep a close watch on the costs for example, and the producers of a Scottish Six would have to ensure that it was as outward looking as possible. The consumers of news in Scotland do not want parochial, but they do want news that reflects the country they live in.
It may be that, in rejecting a Scottish Six, the BBC has opted for a revamped Reporting Scotland or a hybrid with a Scottish anchor presenting Scottish items before crossing to the London studios for UK and international news.
However, neither of these options are satisfactory and risk giving the impression that, rather than recognising that devolution affects how news is covered, the BBC still thinks the “big” stories should be covered by London and that things can pretty much carry on as they are. The reality is that Scotland has changed. The BBC should change too.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel