STRONG opposition to a proposed new fish farm in the Sound of Jura cannot have come as a great surprise to the industry. It is not, as it were, flavour of the month. Massive problems with sea lice, in particular, and the use of chemicals to control them, have led to caution among coastal communities, never mind from environmentalists who find fish farming essentially unnatural.
Still, the industry remains an important part of Scotland’s hinterland economy, creating jobs, meeting demand for healthy food and contributing significantly to our exports. For all the problems, fish farms keep coming forward, seeing profits to be made in a product still cherished by our food sector.
Thus, Kames Fish Farming (KFF) Ltd is hoping to start a 12-cage operation at Dounie, in the new Loch Sunart to the Sound of Jura Marine Protected Area.
A small, experienced Scottish family business seeking to expand, KFF says it will create six jobs, has no plans to pollute the Sound (indeed needs a clean marine environment for its product) and has strict containment protocols to stop farmed fish escaping. In addition, it will farm rainbow trout which, it points out, are less susceptible than salmon to sea lice.
This has not prevented a loud chorus of opposition from echoing across the Sound. Objectors fear the farm could pollute the water with uneaten food, faeces and chemical residues, affecting a habitat of endangered skate in a deep trench nearby, not to mention wild salmon and sea trout that breed in the River Add.
Humans, too, might suffer: a local wild swimmers’ club says its members would no longer feel comfortable while other objectors adduce the visual impact on a site of natural beauty.
This is an application in its earliest stages, with many hurdles to jump. No one wants to throw the baby out with the seawater but the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (KFF’s first port of call) will clearly have to consider the sheer weight of opposition, though – as ever – dispassionate, scientific evidence should also inform any decisions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel