NEWS that fewer repetitions during workouts could yield better results will doubtless be welcomed by many of us seeking to become fit promptly.
The sting in the tail of research by University of Stirling scientists is that it refers to high-intensity interval training, and that you will have to get on your specialised exercise bike for a “supramaximal” sprint. There is no way of getting round it.
Or is there? Perhaps we need to walk before we can sprint, and what better place to do that than on the John Muir Way, which has been recognised as one of Scotland’s Great Trails.
The prestigious Scottish Natural Heritage accolade honours the 134-mile route that stretches across Scotland’s heartland from Helensburgh in the west to Dunbar in the east.
Dunbar was the birthplace of Muir, who pioneered conservation and is often referred to as the father of national parks. He helped save Yosemite Valley and was credited with saving America’s soul from total surrender to materialism.
He once said: “I could have become a millionaire, but chose instead to become a tramp.”
No one would be expected to tramp the whole 134 miles of Scotland’s John Muir Way in one go and, as it takes in castles and a plethora of interesting towns and villages, the best approach might be to walk it in short bursts.
After all, life is a marathon, not a sprint.
The health benefits of walking are proven. But this new research into high-intensity interval training also sounds like it is on the ball.
Indeed, the general principle of short, intense sprints would presumably apply to other gym exercises beyond exercise-biking.
The long and the short of it is that, if you can combine short cycle sprints in the gym with a good, long walk on the likes of the John Muir Way, you will be doing your body and your soul a power of good.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here