GOOD news from the A9 is almost as rare as a celebrity surviving 2016. However, new figures released by Transport Scotland’s A9 Safety Group reveal that, since the introduction of average speed cameras on Scotland’s longest and most notorious trunk road, fewer drivers have exceeded the speed limit and overall casualties have fallen by 45 per cent.
There have been fewer fatalities and, over a period of 21 months, a 63 per cent reduction in serious casualties between Dunblane and Inverness has been recorded. It is difficult to argue with such figures when judging average speed cameras. They are not everyone’s friend. The “yellow vultures” arouse indignation among free spirits of the road who are suspicious of authority and motoring enthusiasts with practical objections.
Jeremy Clarkson speculated recently that better weather or safer cars might just as well be the reasons for fewer accidents on the A9. It has even been argued that the numbers involved in the seemingly large percentages for fatality reduction are few.
However, we retain a preference for life over death and for statistics over speculation, even if critics may have valid points about the increased risks from cars bunching up and the propensity for the mind to wander in “boring” traffic.
We would acknowledge, too, that there have been problems with lower average speed limits past sections of upgrading. Adding varying average speeds to the already disorientating mix of single and dual carriageway is something we could do without.
However, the upgrading is necessary for the dualling of the A9, which remains the main safety priority in the long run. In the short term, on the latest figures, average speed cameras are proving to be a valid safety measure – even if, among the 142,000 motorists travelling up and down “the spine of Scotland” daily, they may put a few backs up.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel