IS it any wonder that when business leaders were asked what they ate for breakfast, the most common answer was porridge? Yes, some preferred yoghurt or cereal – and there were even a few that liked a fry-up – but the bosses and company founders interviewed for the new book What Do Leaders Eat for Breakfast? have made the right choice in opting for porridge oats.
Whether Scotland can claim porridge as it own is another matter. In fact, researchers at the University of Florence recently uncovered a stone tool which suggested porridge was consumed in Italy more than 30,000 years ago, making it the first cultivated meal to be eaten by ancient Europeans.
By comparison, the evidence of porridge consumption in Scotland is much more recent (around 4000BC) although the passion with which Scots have embraced the food is unmatched. It has also become a light-hearted way to judge the character and mettle of a Scot, with anyone who dares to add milk, jam or fruit to their porridge being viewed with the utmost suspicion.
Of course, there will always be some who find porridge the ultimate in self-denial, but perhaps the doubters will believe some of the food’s fans. Famously, porridge was the breakfast of choice of Nelson Mandela and Buzz Aldrin; it was also porridge that helped power Roald Amundsen to the South Pole.
However, the more important reason for eating porridge, particularly in a country struggling with obesity, is because it is so good for us. Not only is it a good source of protein, porridge helps to stabilise blood sugar levels, helps to lower cholesterol and it can reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, another of modern Scotland’s great health problems. There is also some evidence that porridge can help reduce the symptoms of depression by boosting levels of serotonin.
You can believe Mandela or Buzz Aldrin on the benefits of porridge – or even Wallace and Gromit for that matter – but why not believe the evidence of your own body?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here