JAMES Fraser (Letters, February 2) is right to identify "party campers" as a problem and also that a package of measures was needed to address this issue on east Loch Lomond. These measures included investment in a new campsite at Sallochy, control of parking, alcohol by-laws and, most importantly, effective policing. The by-laws were only a small part of this and were promoted by the park authority as a temporary measure. It is quite clear now that the package of measures would have worked without any need for the by-laws whose main impact has been to prevent responsible camping under access rights.
My partner works at a school in a deprived area of Glasgow and the few times that the children get to go in the great outdoors is when their parents or grandparents take them away on a camping trip. For many this is their first experience of wild nature, usually by a loch shore. As Dave Morris said (Letters, February 2) camping bans simply discriminate against people who are restricted by age, mobility or disability. I supported the creation of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park because the area is so important to the people of the Clyde conurbation and because it is intended as a national park for everyone, not just local residents.
Perhaps the rapidly growing public petition to the Minister to be found at change.org will persuade the Environment Minister, Aileen McLeod, that the only thing her by-laws will achieve is criminalisation of responsible campers. The petition was started by Willie McLeod, a respected outdoor recreationist and educationist, who has long worked to help disadvantaged communities in the west of Scotland get into the great outdoors. This is certain to become a touchstone issues for the next Scottish Parliament and already, lots of people are indicating that how they vote in the forthcoming elections will be determined by whether or not candidates will support our access rights and commit to repealing these by-laws.
Nick Kempe,
23 Queen Square, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel