I READ with interest Margaret McCulloch’s Agenda column (“Much to be done to win workplace quality for our ethnic minorities) about the employment problems faced by ethnic minorities.
I am disabled, and thus, am also in a minority, to whom almost every word – and certainly every sentiment – of the article could be applied.
Though I have had similar qualifications to many of my erstwhile colleagues, I was not invited for interviews. Workplace discrimination can be very subtle – hooray, someone has at last admitted this – with the result that without effective remedies, no amount of assistance with CV writing, interview techniques or Department of Work and Pension “carrot and stick” incentives will make the slightest difference. We might, by some miracle, find a job, but how to keep it is the six million dollar question, a question that most able-bodied enforcers politely ignore.
People who are deemed “disabled” are labelled thus by medics, politicians and others, who, no matter how well meaning, think it is perfectly acceptable to ask “‘What is wrong with you?” and expect a civil answer. They like to put people in boxes, to “know what to expect” and so continue to indulge in all manner of conduct which, from the public at large would be deemed offensive, and rightly so. The “see me” campaign, and many like it, make this point very clearly. We are not our disabilities.
If I saw a woman on the street who looked “ordinary”, I would be considered grossly offensive if I asked her “Can you go to the toilet without assistance?” and yet, because I have a conspicuous disability – which puts me at a disadvantage in all sorts of subtle and none too subtle ways – I am expected to identify with it, explain it, and ignore it.
Identify with it, because that was the first label was given –- “I’m sorry, your daughter has cerebral palsy” - which became the only thing I identified about myself for decades, and a heavy burden to carry, which completely ignored everything I can do, and all the other good things about me.
Explain it, because almost every government department I have dealings with expects me to elucidate for them – for the thousandth time – just how much I am actually disabled, before they will provide me with basic financial help and “concessionary” services. I don't want or seek concessions. I merely look for equal treatment. It seems that these days, unless we are almost totally incapacitated, we can expect no sympathy from these information gatherers, so convinced are they of the rightness of their “inclusive social and workplace policies”.
And ignore it? Because the Government, in its naivety, tells me it has all these wonderful new laws and workplace policies to discourage workplace bullying, harassment, discrimination, low pay, and so on. So while unsavoury conduct continues, I must pretend it does not, and run the gamut of a hundred conflicting expectations.
Fran McIlvey,
Flat 3, 47 North Meggetland, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel