DAVID Stubley (Letters, October 31) presents a gross misrepresentation of our accounts, and wilfully ignores the work that we do which directly contributes to saving nature both on and off reserves.
Most wildlife cannot be saved from decline by nature reserves alone. For example, puffins are in decline from overfishing, climate change and invasive non-native species. Turtle doves are suffering from agricultural intensification, shooting in Mediterranean countries, and habitat degradation in their African wintering grounds. Pressing for policy changes to help these species is a critical and legitimate part of the conservation delivery.
RSPB spends 90 per cent of its net income on nature conservation, public education and advocacy. This includes our nature reserves but also all other activities that we do to save nature from decline: fighting damaging developments; investigating wildlife crime; advising farmers and landowners; scientific research and monitoring (the critical work which identifies and understands the reasons for species declines and finds the solutions); connecting children with nature and inspiring more people to support nature and conservation through our communications and marketing activities. The remaining 10 per cent is spent on administration.
Of course it costs money to raise the funds we need to do all this. But for every £1 we spend fundraising, we bring in £4 – a figure many businesses would envy. In 2014-2015, after the costs of generating income, the RSPB had £98.8 million to spend on our core charitable objectives.
What a shame Mr Stubley does not acknowledge the good work that RSPB does in partnership with so many people and organisations across Scotland, the UK and elsewhere in the world that share our objective of conserving our precious natural heritage.
Stuart Housden,
Director, RSPB Scotland,
2 Lochside View, Edinburgh Park, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel