POLITICS is a dance and when the new dancehall was opened at Holyrood it was only a matter of time that shoddy practices, similar to those that can be found metaphorically in the dark corners of Westminster, were replicated in Edinburgh. Just as you witness in your local disco the behaviour of those skulking in the shadows on the periphery may fail to meet the standards expected of the dancers illuminated by the glitter-ball.
It completely negates the basic democratic concept of elected representatives supposedly responding to the mood of their own electorate if those with the time and money to do so can exert undue influence on individual or groups of MSPs. The simple answer to the lobbying dilemma (“Row as ministers water down rule on lobbying”, The Herald, October 31) is to ban it completely. We all have a named MSP elected via the ballot-box. If we as individuals or members of an organisation have concerns on a specific subject then these should be addressed to that MSP with no priority of access given to groups or individuals with a vested interest. Our MSP can then pass genuine concerns further up the chain of command to ministers who should be listening to us voters via our MSPs, not paid advocates with special interests which may not be representative of public opinion.
There is no moral justification in a true democracy for paid lobbying and those with resources having greater access to or potential influence on the democratic process. It can rightly create public concern over the possible exploitation of the venal side of an MSP’s character. Bearing in mind its recently adopted mantle as the party of the people, I find it difficult to reconcile the SNP’s reported stance on professional lobbying with abandoning this basic democratic principle.
David J Crawford,
Flat 3/3 131 Shuna Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel