I NOTE with some incredulity that Nicola Sturgeon declared that Scotland's colleges are now “fit for purpose” at the opening of the City of Glasgow College's new building on the Clyde (“Importance of college education in clear focus as Sturgeon opens Glasgow’s £228m supercampus”, The Herald, October 27). The First Minister opened a building which was conceived and planned when the college sector was significantly better funded than it currently is and, unbelievably, it was one which was allowed to proceed, on that basis, after the sector's budget had been cut by almost 25 per cent.
Far from representing a new future for further education, the new buildings at the City of Glasgow College are a real and future danger to the sustainability of other colleges in the city. The city's further education budget has been slashed and student numbers consequently reduced. However, the costs of this unnecessarily large piece of infrastructure will now have to be paid for (almost inevitably by making further even more detrimental cuts to the other two colleges in the city, putting at risk existing buildings and provision in some of Glasgow's poorest communities).
Yet again the SNP, a party which seeks to break links with a centralist UK Government, is demonstrating that in its Scotland, local services are to be deliberately eroded to achieve that aim.
If anyone believes that the SNP's public sector “reforms” offer a glimpse of what things will be like in an independent Scotland then they should ask people employed in those which have had the treatment. A survey of Unison staff in colleges revealed morale at rock bottom and a similar result was obtained from a recent survey of officers in the newly established Police Service of Scotland.
Nobody looking at either of these triumphs of reforming zeal can surely say the quality of service provided has consequently improved.
In the meantime, further evidence of the sector's “fitness for purpose” was again laid bare at Holyrood's public audit committee (“Row deepens over £300,000 payment to college principal”, The Herald, October 27). Surely even Ms Sturgeon's spin cannot absolve her Government from some of the responsibility for these shameful failures all of which happened on her watch.
In the meantime Glasgow Caledonian University's New York venture has, after two years, failed to gain degree awarding status there. Whilst we have been assured that this was funded from the university's own resources it is perhaps yet more evidence that higher education might have been able to have made just a little more of a contribution to the cuts made in post-school education. After all, colleges have been financially slaughtered to protect a sector which seems to have plenty of resources simply to fritter away.
Ian Graham,
6 Lachlan Crescent, Erskine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here