I NOTE with interest your report of the First Minister considering the possibility of a state-funded, parent-controlled Catholic school in Milngavie (“Sturgeon enters talks over radical plan for new school”, The Herald, October 24). I taught for many years in both denominational and non-denominational schools and during those years regularly heard the argument that this was a divisive system.
I was aware that both sets of schools contained significant numbers (of pupils and staff) who were from the ''other side''.
Never did I experience, in the classroom, in the staffroom or in the playground any religious bigotry, yet “experts” on the outside would loudly proclaim this division of schooling to be the root cause of this evil.
Bigotry, racism, prejudice, intolerance – call it what you will, is not taught in school. The fact that denominational schools exist is not the cause of division. Does anyone really believe that were these schools to be abolished tomorrow that religious bigotry would disappear? The growth of Islamophobia is not due to there being separate schools for followers of Islam.
I hear the argument that if some groups wish to have separate schools for religious purposes then let them fund them themselves. So, if separate schooling is the cause of religious bigotry, is it acceptable as long as they are funded privately .
We need more tolerance and fewer knee-jerk statements that ''my views are right, so yours must be wrong”.
James Mills,
29 Armour Square, Johnstone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel