THIS coming weekend – at 2am on October 25 – the clocks go back one hour. On Saturday, October 24, the last day of summer-time 2015, sunrise in Glasgow will be at 08.07, and sunset at 17.55, giving an “official total” of nine hours and 47 minutes of daylight. This change-over occurs fully four weeks after the autumn equinox (September 23, 2015) and into the winter half of the year.
If we wished to retain the same sunrise time as this week, in order that the school run occurs in daylight, we would move the clocks forward next year at 2am on Sunday, February 28. Sunrise would be at 08.10 and sunset at 18.48 (instead of what it will be: at 07.10 and 17.48), yielding 10 hours and 38 minutes of daylight. This date would be three weeks before the spring equinox (March 20, 2016), and a full month before the official start of summer time (2am on March 27, 2016, when total daylight amounts to 12 hours and 48 minutes).
So for the whole of March each year under the current arrangements, we are failing to put to good use the hours of daylight that pass while most of us are still asleep in the morning. We could be transferring it instead to the evening by starting summer-time a month earlier than we do now. By not changing the clocks at the end of February, we are burning gas and electricity and running up bills unnecessarily.
In the old days, summer time used to begin much earlier in March than now. Indeed for three years after 1969/70 we had summer-time all year round. Subsequent research by the think-tank Political and Economic Planning revealed that, as a result, there was an overall reduction in road deaths and injuries, attributable to the use of daylight more in tune with our waking and working habits. And this reduction was proportionately greater the further north in the UK.
So whom do we blame for the past and current cost of delaying the start of summer time in the spring? Of course: a European Union directive and compliance therewith largely by leftist, political supporters. These people peddle myths about climate change (it has always been changing), but do nothing except waste taxpayers' money on subsidies to hopelessly uneconomic green energy, or by banning fracking. They could make a real difference to energy consumption by realigning the clock in the spring, and perhaps even by bringing in double summer-time for May, June, July and August, as occurred during the Second World War (“Berlin time” for everyone).
It is unusual for the SNP and the First Minister to miss an opportunity to foment discord with Westminster. But on this issue, they could go it alone and “stand up for Scotland”. But they won't because they are afraid of offending Brussels. So much for that foolish nonsense of “independence in Europe”. Mind you, even if they did bring in the change, this “middle class Unionist” would still never vote for separation and the SNP.
Richard Mowbray,
14 Ancaster Drive, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel