IAIN Macwhirter’s column on the proposed new runway at either Heathrow or Gatwick (“Rough with the smooth in wooing of the SNP”, The Herald, October 20) was extremely interesting but did not go far enough in looking for alternative solutions. As an airline business traveller averaging more than 60 flights per annum I would like to offer my opinion.
Europe has four airport hubs, my favoured choice being Amsterdam Schiphol, with the other three being Frankfurt, Paris Charles De Gaulle and London Heathrow. If air travellers do not live within easy reach of these airports they will be obliged to take two flights to their destination. For example, today I am travelling to Stavanger, Norway - via Amsterdam. Next month I will travel to Houston, Texas - via Amsterdam. Travelling first south to go north, or first east to go west is far from ideal.
As a business traveller you put up with it, as a tourist traveller you simply don’t do it; you will find a tourist destination with one flight only. The sky above southern England, northern France and the Netherlands is saturated. Europe doesn’t need another runway in London; Europe needs another European hub, but in a separate locale from the four current hubs
Edinburgh and Glasgow airports at just 30 miles apart, and competing for the same limited, short to medium-haul flights are monuments to stupidity and neither comes close to being a national airport. Both are in prime housebuilding locations and should be bulldozed and sold off with the proceeds being used to help fund a real national airport on the Carse of Stirling with fast train links to both Glasgow and Edinburgh similar to the bullet train that runs from Gardemoen Airport to Oslo in Norway. By pooling the flights which currently fly into Glasgow and Edinburgh and by attracting Scandinavian traffic flying west to the Americas, a new airport would gain critical mass and attract direct flights from all over the world. This would have an additional knock on effect of boosting tourism in Scotland and could also lead to a new national airline in a new European hub.
What we need is imagination, not another London runway.
Andrew J Beck,
3 Andrew Crescent, Stenhousemuir.
IT was interesting to read the comments of Stewart Wingate (Letters, October 21), supporting the thoughts of Sir John Elvidge, on the subject of direct air links being vital for a nation - and so he should, since both are employed by the same company that owns and operates Edinburgh and Gatwick Airports, the latter being a contender for the third runway in the south-east of England.
He further complains about the southern monopoly. Presumably he is referring to Heathrow, with its air links to Scotland, but he fails to point out that, the break-up of BAA, by the Competition Commission, was done to create more competition amongst the airlines and to where and from where they decide to fly. Not a lot seems to have changed.
Mike Dooley,
52 Auchendoon Crescent, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel