The growth in the use of the railways is a success story on many levels. Rail travel is more efficient, and environmentally friendly than many of the alternatives. It is an aid to reducing congestion in our town centres. And it is increasingly popular - with passenger journeys up by 35 per cent on the Scotrail network, over the past decade.
But the capacity has not grown along with the demand. Provision of rolling stock remains a stubborn problem, with the number of seats growing by just 15 per cent over the same period, and capacity reduced even further if you take a reduction in standing capacity into account.
Remarkably there has only been one additional seat provided for every 3,300 additional passenger journeys made on the network.
This creates frustration and anger among passengers - just ask the commuters who may pay thousands of pounds to travel regularly between Scotland's cities, yet who may not even be guaranteed a seat. Or the passengers on the new Borders Railway facing standing room only or even cancellations as trains run with only two carriages.
Running trains underoccupied or near empty makes no sense and passengers understand that. But there are routes which are routinely overcrowded, where more trains are plainly needed.
Abellio, the current holders of the ScotRail franchise, have pledged to invest in leasing additional rolling stock, and the company must deliver on the promises made when taking up the contract. But improvements appear painfully slow. Brand new Hitachi trains are to replace outdated models, but only from 2017, two and a half years into Abellio's current seven year contract.
Additional long distance high speed trains serving Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Inverness are not expected until December 2018.
This is not a new problem. Abellio's predecessors frequently wrestled with rolling stock shortages and appeared unable to respond quickly.
To the outsider this is baffling. If demand is there, provision should follow. The internal market of the railways is obviously failing when there are simply not enough trains in the UK and this situation endures for years.
The reason may be because it is more economic for train companies to risk overcrowding with less rolling stock, than to provide more space and risk underoccupancy. Or it may be that the companies which lease trains to providers such as Abellio have a perverse incentive to keep them in short supply and prices high. Perhaps the problem is the relatively short term nature of franchising, with companies unwilling invest significantly in services which they may subsequently lose. It is likely that a combination of these factors is to blame.
But the problems with rolling stock are merely a microcosm of wider rail privatisation with the benefits of competition for passengers still obscure after 21 years.
New rolling stock is welcome, when it comes. But the public will continue to have concerns while our railways are significantly more expensive than those elsewhere in Europe, without offering a correspondingly high service.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel