ALEX Gallagher (Letters, October 14) suggests that if the referendum had produced a different result, an independent Scotland would have a much bigger fiscal deficit than the UK, no national currency, a collapsing oil income, no ability to borrow, and no idea how to manage its own economy. On the other hand, Mr Gallagher believes that the United Kingdom has all the wealth, fiscal strength and political stability to support such a miserably inadequate Scotland, and come to our rescue when our politicians make a complete mess of running our own affairs. What a desperately pessimistic – and unrealistic – opinion he has of his fellow Scots and his own country.
Has Mr Gallagher not noticed that his preferred choice, the UK, despite getting rid of Mr Gallagher’s hopeless party, Labour, from government more than five years ago, is still running an annual fiscal deficit of around £100 billion every year (and forecast to rise to £128 billion in 2015/16), and an eye-watering national debt of over £1.3 billion. The UK Government (whatever its political leanings) is still in thrall to the all-powerful moguls in the City, and has made little or no attempt to control them or guard against another catastrophic financial collapse. Is this the all-powerful, wealthy and stable nation and parliamentary system that he thinks Scotland should depend on for advice on economic and financial management?
Many other small nations with far fewer natural assets and talents than Scotland seem to manage perfectly well in the big wide world (and much better than the UK is doing), so why shouldn’t we follow their example? It is only the doom merchants like Mr Gallagher who are holding us back with their constant pessimism and lack of belief in our own nation.
Iain AD Mann,
7 Kelvin Court, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel