Gotcha! Labour and the Scottish Conservatives have been laying a fiscal trap for the SNP, and yesterday it looked as if John Swinney had fallen into it.
Challenged on whether or not the Nationalists would reverse the UK Government's tax credit cuts, he said there was “a significant amount of doubt” about whether the future Scottish Government could in fact reverse them.
Mr Swinney calculates that the UK benefit reforms could lose Scottish claimants some £6 billion by 2020. This is a very large sum to find out of a fixed budget and would mean hard choices or an increase in taxes in Scotland.
Only now is the scale of the UK Government's roll back of welfare becoming clear. As The Herald reported yesterday, the think tank IPPR calculates that the average family in Scotland will be £200 worse off with 800,000 families losing up to £500 a year.
But why is this a problem for an SNP government that has opposed the cuts all along? Can't they continue to blame Westminster?
It's a question of putting your money where your mouth is. Scottish Secretary David Mundell was adamant yesterday that the Scottish Government will have all the power it needs to top up welfare benefits to its heart's content. But it will have to raise the money to pay for them.
Mr Mundell rejected the claims both of the SNP and the former Labour chancellor, Gordon Brown, that the welfare powers are not genuine, and that Westminster retains a veto on welfare spending.
This must be the most transparent fiscal trap since the Malt Tax in 1713. The cost of welfare is being transferred from the UK to Scotland. The Scottish Government will have to increase taxes significantly if it is to meet its promises about creating a more caring society.
Well, why not just tax the rich? After all, according to Oxfam last week, the top four billionaires in Scotland have more wealth than the bottom 20 per cent of the population. Their wealth increased £25bn last year alone, and the wealth gap appears to be growing faster in Scotland than in England.
The problem here is that wealthy people are rather keen on keeping their cash, and have armies of accountants whose job it is to shuffle their wealth around so that their taxation is minimised.
One of the top four plutocrats in Scotland is the ex Harrods owner Mohammed Fayed. I'm sure Mr Fayed pays his taxes religiously, but you can also be sure that if there is a super-tax imposed on wealth, people like him will reconsider their country of residence.
Rich people can keep a holiday castle or two in Scotland while hopping over the Border to England where it will soon be illegal to increase income tax – at least according to the Tory manifesto last May.
The problem is that “only little people pay tax”, as hotel tycoon Leona Hemsley put it. It will be those on lower and middle incomes, who'll have to pay the cost of increased welfare in Scotland.
The Tories believe that this will secure their revival. Ruth Davidson is already saying that only her party can be trusted to use Holyrood's tax powers to actually reduce the tax burden so that middle earners “pay less”.
Labour also believe the Scotland Bill tax powers will be their electoral saviour. Kezia Dugdale has challenged Nicola Sturgeon to restore the 50p tax rate in Scotland on those earning more than £150,000 to pay for higher teacher salaries in poor areas.
The SNP is at pains to point out, rightly, that this is a matter for the future. The Smith Commission income tax reforms will not become law until 2017/18 at the earliest.
However, Nicola Sturgeon is on record as saying that, if the tax powers had been available today, she would restore the 50p band irrespective of developments south of the Border.
Will she honour that pledge in future? It's hard to tell. It's a long way off, and though the SNP is keen on its radical image, it is always more interested in retaining power.
There is actually little evidence that Scottish voters are more sympathetic to welfare claimants than English voters. Nor are they over keen on paying taxes.
The Scottish Parliament has had the power to increase the basic rate of income tax by 3p since 1999. No government has contemplated using the Scottish rate. It will be a brave government that ever does.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel