On the surface, a mistake made during the search for pensioner Janet McKay was another worrying sign that all is not well at Police Scotland.
Superficially there are similarities with the M9 crash which led to the deaths of Lamara Bell and John Yuill and the terribly sad
conclusion to the search for Mrs McKay.
On both occasions Police were searching for missing persons and in both cases accurate, useful information from members of the public appears not to have been used or to have reached the right people.
This time, one lesson at least appears to have been learned and Police Scotland have moved quickly to own up to the communication breakdown and apologise for the fact that it occurred.
In the case of Ms Bell, the insufficient response may have led to her death. We do not know whether a delay in acting may have influenced the outcome of the search for Mrs McKay - it may simply have cut short the days of worry suffered by her relatives and this in itself would have been desirable.
The full details have not been made public and the 'adverse incident' to use police jargon, will be investigated.
That process should be allowed to run its course, and no-one should leap to conclusions.
The lesson here, according to Calum Steele of the Scottish Police Federation, is that there may be no lesson beyond the fact that sometimes mistakes are made. A young inexperienced officer forgot to pass on information that may well not have influenced the investigation, given that it was not first hand. In social media postings made in a personal capacity, Mr Steele said people had to be allowed to learn on the job and implied criticism of the decision to refer the case to the Police Investigation and Review Commissioner (PIRC).
"If we create an environment where officers believe any mistake will result in a press release & PIRC referral this will destroy morale," he said.
One would expect communications to be better within a single force than under multiple bodies, so any breakdowns are concerning.
However what is really worrying is the way the force has become a lightning rod for criticism. Under the new single force every problem is viewed as systemic, every failure part of a culture of crisis.
Failures must be addressed, of course. But that does not mean every mis-step should become a resignation issue or a political football.
After months of pressure on Chief Constable Stephen House to step down, he announced his intention to bring forward his departure from Police Scotland, after the M9 crash scandal. Now calls for his resignation have been replaced by calls for the resignation of justice secretary Michael Matheson.
Labour's Graeme Pearson justifies this on the basis that government ministers created Police Scotland, and "shouldn't hide behind front line officers."
But this is a dangerous path. Ultimately, ministers must indeed be accountable. But there is a difference between that and treating adverse events as charges on a party-political rap sheet. Operational control is not and should not be a matter for ministers.
It would be advisable for all those involved to await the findings of the PIRC investigation and take a more measured approach rather than making capital out of what was surely more than anything, a tragic accident.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel