Mark Smith’s powerful article setting out the moral, commercial and environmental case for a ban on the killing of birds for "sport" will no doubt enrage the gun lobby’s official apologists ("Compelling case for ban on shooting of all birds", The Herald, September 22). Their defence turns on a series of grossly inflated figures as to what shooting is supposed to be worth to the economy.
Even less credibly, those apologists claim that the publicly subsidised environmental vandalism and wildlife slaughter intrinsic to grouse moor "management" (the burning and draining of peat bogs, the killing of vast numbers of indigenous species such as stoats, weasels, foxes, corvids and raptors) enriches the landscape.
On the moors, grouse are the target of the shooters. Elsewhere, it is pheasants and partridges. Some 50 million are mass-produced and released each year in Britain to serve as feathered targets. The Dutch banned the production of birds for "sport shooting" in 2002. This was mainly because of the environmental damage the activity causes. Perversely, successive Westminster governments have swallowed and regurgitated the gun lobbyists’ claim that shooting is good for the environment.
Ultimately, every human activity, if it’s to achieve societal support, must pass a basic ethical test. The hobby killing of birds, with all the attendant predator persecution and environmental damage, comprehensively fails that test.
Andrew Tyler,
Director, Animal Aid,
The Old Chapel, Bradford Street,
Tonbridge, Kent.
I have never read such utter bilge as the article by Mark Smith.
Shooters and gamekeepers are true countrymen who take great pride in the diversity of wildlife present within their estates and recent surveys have confirmed that shoots and estates do more for conservation than all the charities combined.
Without the management of moorland, red grouse would be much more endangered. I have walked moors which are left uncared for and they are barren and devoid of our wildlife.
Shooting an available surplus of birds annually is at its most basic a form of farming and the description of their rearing as being in "unpleasant little cages and pens" is so wide of the mark. Pheasants are purpose-bred as are all farming stock but the fact is they are very quickly released into the wild and provide a truly organic source of food. Shooting also provides a substantial income in rural areas where other sources of income are limited.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent,
Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here