Next Sunday, the people of Catalunya go to the polls to choose their new government.
However, this election will have further implications than merely a change in seats for Catalan political parties.
Due to the intransigence of the Spanish state, this vote has been given the status of a proxy for a referendum on Catalan independence.
Indeed, Catalan nationalist leaders have said in recent weeks that a victory for them would launch a "road map" to Catalan independence within 18 months.
I will be there, as an election observer at the invitation of the
Catalan government. That said, I certainly won't be neutral. I am firmly
supporting Catalan democracy. Catalunya is a nation, and has a right
to choose, and absolutely nobody should stand in the way of a
democratic expression of will.
My Catalan colleagues watched our own experience of an independence
referendum one year ago with a great deal of envy and frustration. The
cooperation between the UK government and the Scottish government –
the signing of the Edinburgh Agreement, the explicit agreement to
respect the result of that vote no matter what the outcome - was a
good news story for democracy and an example the State of Spain would do well to follow.
Instead, what should be an energising debate about Catalunya's place in the world has instead become a divisive and frustrated binary argument. In the absence of a democratic process, the result can only be festering frustration, and I think there is a real risk of that frustration spilling over.
This point absolutely underlines a key difference between Scotland and
Catalunya. Whereas nobody anywhere in Scottish or UK politics
seriously thought that we did not have the right to make the decision,
regardless of their views on yes or no, in Madrid especially the unity
of Spain is a matter of theology.
This attitude is going to need something of a speedy reformation if Spanish politicians are going to continue to claim to be democrats.
The alternative is being seen as deliberately ignoring a democratic,
peaceful decision of the Catalan people in order to keep Catalan taxes
flowing to the central Spanish coffers.
As Spain's wealthiest and most economically productive region, accounting for about a quarter of
Spain's tax revenue, Spain needs Catalunya on the books. Indeed, take Catalunya out of Spain's numbers and Spain is back in the economic danger zone just as it looks like they're coming out of it.
For Catalans, as with many Scots, the wish for independence is not
just down to questions of identity, language and history, but there is
also an underlying rejection of the dominant, central government.
Many Catalans do not see the conservative, free-market orientation of the Spanish government as compatible with their own political preferences and understandably believe that they could manage their own economy more effectively independently rather than through the current centralised system.
This is certainly a sentiment many in our own country would sympathise with.
As we saw in our own referendum too, the EU has not exactly been forthcoming on the question of independence and EU membership, and I fully expect that this chilly neutrality will continue. However, the EU is pragmatic and when the votes are counted, from a Brussels perspective a Catalan passport looks very much like a Spanish one. The issues, though, from a Brussels perspective, are way more complicated than they were in Scotland's case - the Eurozone has zero - nada - rules on how to deal with such an eventuality and the markets will be watching.
However, Catalunya is a nation, and has a right to choose.
That is absolutely clear.
And the EU is pragmatic enough and flexible enough to adapt – as it did with the fall of the Iron Curtain, the reunification of Germany, the exit of Greenland, and on many other
occasions - and because the alternative is simply anti-democratic,
anti-European, and potentially explosive.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel