Alistair Darling says he is confused about what his party's leader, Jeremy Corbyn, stands for. Labour is where it is now, though, partly because so many members and voters were increasingly baffled as to what the party stood for under its previous leadership - a leadership which included Mr Darling himself.
This perplexity reached its apex in the damaging muddle over the UK Government's welfare reform bill, which saw Harriet Harman insisting Labour MPs should simply abstain.
It was because Mr Corbyn seemed to have a coherent set of beliefs and clear position that he commanded such a huge mandate from his party in winning the leadership election.
Another leader with such a vote of confidence from his members might have enjoyed a lengthy honeymoon period. Given the hostility he faces in sections of the media, Mr Corbyn was never going to have much time to bask in his popularity.
However his first week in the job has been remarkable for the extent to which he has managed to squander any momentum generated by his win.
Though his victory was widely predicted for weeks, there seems to have been little planning done for his arrival in post. These past few days were a chance, surely to set out some of his policies. Some, such as re-nationalising the railways, command considerable public support. Others such as quantitative easing may be a harder sell, but a case could have been made, a picture presented of a dynamic new leader leading his party in a bold new direction.
Instead Mr Corbyn appears to have blundered from one avoidable bad headline to another. He turned a positive into a negative by arriving late for a guaranteed standing ovation at the TUC's annual congress. Predictable problems such as the criticism of his shadow chancellor's views of the IRA, and over his unwillingness to sing the national anthem, appeared to have been unanticipated.
A muddle - to put it kindly - over the party's policy on Europe seems likely to foreshadow other major internal policy rifts in future.
Expectations from opponents within and outwith his own party were not high. Mr Corbyn has largely lived down to them.
True, over the course of a lengthy leadership campaign, he has traded on a brand of anti-politics. He scored his biggest success of the week by undermining the Westminster routine at Prime Minister's Questions. While his tactic of crowdsourcing questions for the Prime Minister annoyed lovers of Westminster theatre, and lobby journalists, it played well with the electorate.
However there is a difference between rejecting traditional politics and spin and eschewing any semblance of competence. The appointment of veteran advisor Neale Coleman, widely respected for his work with Ken Livingstone when he was London Mayor appears to offer hope that Mr Corbyn's camp may get back on track. But in yesterday's addition of convicted fire-raiser Mike Watson to his House of Lords team, the Labour leader appears to have marched straight into another elephant trap.
Mr Corbyn will need to wise up, and fast. It is possible to be maverick yet organised and to dress down without appearing shambolic. And it is possible to generate positive stories without handing opponents opportunities on a plate.
It is not only possible. For Labour and its new leader, it is vital.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel