This article was originally published in June, 2015
Much is being made of the 75th anniversary of the Dunkirk 'Miracle'. And rightly so. The evacuation rescued 300,000 fighting men. It also enabled a morale-boosting, positive spin on what had been a military debacle.
Much less known - and not at all celebrated - is the fact that on 4 June, 1940, the day after the evacuation from Dunkirk was completed, ten thousand Scots in Normandy launched an attack on the Germans.
The offensive by the 51st Highland Division on the Somme was only partially successful. The next day, the Germans countered, with interest. The Highland Division was knocked for six. The Argyll and Sutherland battalions in particular suffered heavy casualties. It was said to have been the darkest day in the history of that famous regiment.
The Highland Division retreated over the River Bresle and re-grouped. But the game was up. Its leader, General Fortune, knew that. His Division was outnumbered and outgunned in every aspect, particularly tanks. There was no support from the RAF. The Luftwaffe had total command of the skies.
Worse still, the French army was in complete disarray, its fragile morale shattered by the German advance, many units simply abandoning the fight and fleeing along with civilian refugees.
The only sensible military option for the Highland Division was evacuation back to Britain. Fortune recommended an immediate retreat to Le Havre. The evacuation of ten thousand men from there, a major international port, would have been a relatively simple matter.
However, Churchill refused Fortune's request and ordered the Highlanders to continue to fight. Churchill, of course, had form as a would-be military strategist. He was an enthusiastic advocate of the Gallipoli Campaign in 1915. In June 1940, he hoped the presence of the Highland Division would stiffen the military resistance of the French.
Perhaps his political objectives were even more important. The French were already starting to blame the British for the disaster befalling their country. The British Expeditionary Force, they argued, was a half-hearted effort and, at the first opportunity, it had packed up and run off home. For Churchill, the continued presence of the Highland Division in France countered such accusations.
Either way, for military or political reasons, Churchill abandoned the Highlanders. It's hard not to recall General Wolfe's assessment of the worth of Scottish soldiers: "No great mischief if they fall."
After a week of further retreat, with the French close to surrender and the collapse of its armies evident to all, Fortune was finally given permission to evacuate his Division. By then, Le Havre had been cut off by Rommel and his Panzers. A desperate, last-minute plan to evacuate the Highlanders from St. Valery, a small fishing port, bound on either side by high cliffs, proved to be forlorn. Fortune surrendered and ten thousand Scotsmen ended up in German POW camps.
It could be argued that the Highland Division was just unlucky. It was doing a tour of duty on the Maginot Line when the Germans invaded France in May 1940 and was cut off from the rest of the BEF. It's easy too to be wise after a war. The shocking fragility of the French forces, the crass ineptness of its senior leadership, were only fully exposed after the disaster. Then again, perhaps Churchill should have heeded the professional advice of his commander in the field.
Whatever the reasons for the calamity at St. Valery, Fortune's Highland Division should be remembered with pride. But after a victorious war, the British people weren't interested in defeats and surrenders. St. Valery was forgotten about, an embarrassment.
The capitulation of Singapore was another wartime humiliation, redeemed in the popular mind, by the extraordinary courage and heroism of the POWs in the face of the brutality of their Japanese captors.
Those who surrendered at St. Valery endured forced marches, with little sustenance, across France and Belgium, then transport in coal barges and cattle wagons to POW camps in Eastern Germany and Poland. Rank-and-file soldiers were forced into back-breaking labour in mines, quarries and factories. Some managed daring escapes. In the freezing last winter of the war, as the Red Army advanced from the east, the POW camps were abandoned and the starving prisoners condemned to stagger hundreds of miles through the snow - the so-called Death Marches, another insufficiently recognised feat of courage and endurance.
Most of all, we should remember the valour of the Fighting 51st in France. Ill-equipped and out-gunned, they fought with outstanding discipline and bravery in the face of overwhelming odds. They would probably have held out for even longer at St. Valery had the French around them not hoisted the white flag.
It's too late to award a St. Valery medal to the survivors. But at least we can honour their memory. There have been some fine memoirs from survivors, a book or two, a poignant song from the Battlefield Band.
But St. Valery remains a minor footnote in Scottish history. The Fighting 51st deserves better.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article