HAVING got used to the wonderful acronym Evel, English Votes for English Laws, we may in the not too far-off future have to become accustomed to Svel, Scottish Votes for English Laws.
Just before Christmas, Alex Salmond, the First Nationalist, let slip the SNP were thinking of dropping their self-denying ordnance at Westminster of not voting on anything they regarded as affecting only England.
This week, Nicola Sturgeon put flesh on the Salmond bones, making clear Alec's Army of SNP MPs, post May 7, would be prepared to vote on legislation affecting England's NHS to reverse the privatisation that threatened to have a budgetary knock-on effect on Scotland's own devolved NHS.
Of course, this bodes the question, using the budgetary knock-on principle, why stop at health? What about education, transport or whatever?
But what Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon appear to be about is showing, so to speak, a bit of political leg to Ed Miliband, who, if the electoral arithmetic pans out, might have to become unusually cosy with those nasty Nationalists not only to enter No 10 but also stay there for any length of time.
Meantime, the grand purveyor of Evel used his first venture to Scotland since the referendum vote to make crystal clear that fairness to England meant stopping Scots from voting on England-only matters.
Yet, once again David Cameron, just as he did on the morning of the referendum result, appeared to show himself more as a political tactician than a strategist.
With a deal of understatement, the Prime Minister admitted "we're going to have to find a way through the Evel proposal to safeguard the integrity of the UK budgeting process but also to make sure that there's a fair arrangement".
At least, he did not use the word muddle but the impression was given.
Mr Cameron's Cabinet chum William Hague has been busy working out which of three Evel options, the Tories will support. Chances are, they will plump for so-called Option 3, which involves inserting between the last two stages of a Bill, a Grand Committee of English MPs, which would vote on a Legislative Consent Motion. The hope is it would be binding.
Under this option, Scottish MPs would be able to take part in all the stages of a Bill apart from the detailed Committee Stage and the newly inserted English Grand Committee Stage.
But given Scots MPs and Welsh and Northern Irish ones too would be able to take part in the very final vote, Third Reading, then, in theory, they could combine with some English MPs to veto an English-backed Bill. If this happened, the legislative process would have to start from scratch.
Now England-only legislation might for some be reasonably straightforward to deal with but this week Chancellor George Osborne made clear the Evel principle would apply to the UK Budget and the consequent UK Finance Bill.
In these circumstances, Mr Cameron's "finding a way through" could be tricky under our increasingly Heath Robinson-constructed constitution.
When asked precisely how Scots MPs would be banned from votes on the Budget, a member of the No 10 Praetorian Guard paused and said: "This will have to be looked at moving forward." You bet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article