In substance, it was a dry technical analysis of the mechanics of currency unions but, in effect, Mark Carney's speech in Edinburgh yesterday was an exposé.
It showed up the weakness of Alex Salmond's claim that an independent Scotland would be able to maintain a currency union with the rest of the UK while also having full and free control over taxation, spending and borrowing.
"A durable, successful currency union requires some ceding of national sovereignty," declared the Governor of the Bank of England. It was the last thing the First Minister wanted to hear. Invoking the spectre of eurozone-style crises, Mr Carney talked of the need in the eurozone for "further, very significant steps" allowing countries to share risks and pool fiscal resources in order to support the currency union, even highlighting proposals under discussion in the EU for pooled employment benefits. He concluded that shared institutions and strict fiscal rules would be necessary to support a Scottish-UK monetary union too.
Though Mr Carney did not say so, the notion that Scotland could be an equal partner in such a union, when it would account for 10% of GDP and the rest of the UK for 90%, appears to belong in the box marked "wishful thinking". The speech did not raise any new arguments but, coming from such an influential, impartial and trusted figure, it was freighted with significance. It exposes the gulf between what the Scottish Government says it would like to do in an independent Scotland and what would be possible. For instance, the SNP has pledged that corporation tax would be cut by 3% below the UK rate. Under a currency union in which fiscal policies had to be aligned between Scotland and the remaining UK, it is hard to see the Westminster Government agreeing to that.
Others have warned before now that the Mr Salmond's vision of a currency union that allowed the Scottish Government free rein over its economy was unrealistic. Professor John Kay, a former member of the First Minister's Council of Economic Advisers, has said that it would be "difficult to negotiate terms that were consistent with the aspirations of independence". He would expect such talks to fail.
He believes, as do dissenters within Yes Scotland, that there ought to be a Plan B, and that Plan B should be a separate Scottish currency. Jim Sillars, Dennis Canavan and the Green Party's Patrick Harvie have all considered the pitfalls of a currency union and concluded that it does not sound much like independence.
They favour a separate currency. The First Minister will not wish to countenance that proposition, not least because a separate currency would bring its own problems, but ignoring the need for a Plan B when Plan A appears unsatisfactory is not going to reassure anyone.
How much will all this matter to Scots? Polling suggests that currency as an issue in itself is a bit of a turn off but also that winning the economic argument is the key to winning the referendum. Mr Carney's remarks make that harder for the SNP.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article