READERS of this column may have noticed I am a Yes man when it comes to independence.
I admit to being slightly tempted by this week's offer from George Osborne and his Treasury. You may have seen the headline: "Scottish households £2000 better off if they reject independence."
I read on avidly to see if the £2k will be added to my pension. Or deducted from the tax on my pension. Or sent as an annual lump sum for a sunshine cruise. After I have blown my winter fuel allowance on a month or two of the two-bar electric fire.
You could wade through the Treasury document and never find out how, when, or even if you can collect the £2000 a year. But you will find statements such as: "Scottish independence would create 'significant headwinds' to economic growth and could see exports to the remainder of the UK drop by 80%."
The Treasury quotes academic research which says "trade between the US and Canada is 44%lower than it would be if there were no international border between them." The experts could have added that if there was no border then Canada would not be its own country but part of the United States. This is on a par logically with the proposition that if your auntie had a different genital configuration she might be your uncle.
Sadly, Mr Osborne's offer of £2k a year in everyone's sporran is not genuine. Which is a shame, since this would be a welcome change from the Union debate of 1707 when only a parcel of rogues got to pocket the English gold.
It is yet another bit of Westminster scaremongering. The warning is that if we choose independence, by 2044 this "border effect" will have reduced our trade with England by £5bn a year. Equivalent to a small part of the Trident budget.
I would risk my hypothetical Osborne windfall for a bet on Scottish trade post-independence. The rest of the UK may be the loser, since Scotland exported £36bn of goods and services to the rest of Britain in 2011 and imported £49bn worth.
Scotland will just have to stop buying British and get busy selling to the world our whisky, Aberdeen Angus beef, fish, and shortbread with maybe some technology as well. And whatever oil and gas is left.
l No economic brain cells were expended in the making of this article.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article