Scotland is setting an example to the rest of the world with its commitment to action on climate change and using resources efficiently.
With ambitious goals sometimes you have to take the leap and do the big, difficult things to help you reach those goals. Action and leadership by the public sector will be the key to unlocking the scale of transformation required to create a sustainable Scotland by 2050.
Scotland should be proud of what has been achieved. There is a legally binding world-leading commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 42% by 2020 compared to 1990, and then 80% by 2050. Scotland leads the UK in renewable power, with 36% of our electricity consumption already met from renewable energy.
The new Resource Efficient Scotland programme aims to help businesses and the public sector deliver more than £2bn of annual savings in energy, water and raw material use.
The public sector has been in the vanguard of a commitment to cut carbon and deliver national targets. It directly employs almost one-quarter of the Scottish workforce, or more than 500,000 people. It also has a huge potential influence over buildings, infrastructure, the private sector and local communities, directly and indirectly. At the Carbon Trust we have worked with 150 public sector bodies in Scotland to develop carbon management plans. We estimate these 150 organisations represent more than 95% of all public sector emissions (approximately 3.4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year).
These carbon management plans include recommendations for projects to help lower emissions. Aberdeen City Council was one of the first to be involved with our public sector programmes in 2003. By 2006 the council had exceeded its 25% reduction target set for 2015 through using renewable energy for street lighting and building improvements. The most cost-effective reductions are typically achieved through a change in behaviour, where low and no cost measures can result in immediate savings. Turning down thermostats or switching off unused equipment have real and quantifiable financial benefit, which becomes even more compelling as energy prices rise.
However, some two-thirds of the recommended measures have not been implemented yet. In a recent report the Carbon Trust identified the major barriers to implementing carbon management plans. These included: senior leadership not sufficiently engaged and incentivised; a lack of availability of project finance; a shortage of skilled staff and resources; and split incentives (especially in schools and tenanted buildings), where those most able to reduce emissions do not benefit from doing so.
Politically, it is not easy to make serious spending commitments during a time of public austerity, despite the strong business case and returns on investment. Scotland remains committed to finding capital to roll out necessary measures, but has to look at creating new financing mechanisms in order to invest to save. The Green Investment Bank could prove to be very useful in providing this access to capital for the public sector.
Practically, it is not easy to make major and disruptive changes to buildings. Also, climate change is not viewed as a top priority, with the economy and the independence debate dominating discourse. But big, strategic decisions need to be made sooner rather than later. Meeting long-term carbon reduction targets to 2050 will take more than some insulation and efficient boilers. New ways will have to be found for using buildings, reforming procurement and delivering services to the public. Major retrofits will have to be made to the public estate, and areas could be transformed with on-site renewable energy and district heating networks.
The public sector deserves praise for what has been accomplished over the past decade. With the right drive, investment and support in future decades, Scotland will become a low-carbon leader and a net exporter of energy, and could have one of the most efficient and modern public sectors in the world.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article