Alcohol has been in the news this week so it is timely to remind people that my colleagues and I are fully committed to implementing minimum pricing.
Minimum pricing deals with a specific problem – the increase in consumption of, and harm from, ever cheaper booze – those high-strength ciders, beers, vodka and gin sold at pocket-money prices that are the real source of Scotland's alcohol problem.
Alcohol misuse takes its toll on families, blights communities and stretches support services across Scotland. The impact of excessive consumption is estimated to cost us £3.6 billion each year – that's £900 for every adult in Scotland – through health, crime and employment harms.
We strongly believe that a minimum price per unit of alcohol will be the most effective and efficient way to tackle alcohol misuse. Setting the minimum price at 50 pence per unit will have significant health and social benefits, such as fewer alcohol-related deaths, hospital admissions and a reduction in crime.
This landmark policy will save lives – and quickly.
Minimum pricing continues to have the strong backing of those who work daily with the effects of alcohol misuse – our doctors, nurses, the police and public health experts.
There is also strong empirical evidence that minimum pricing will reduce consumption and hence alcohol-related harm. In Canada, a 10% increase in the average minimum price of all alcoholic beverages was associated with an 8.9% decrease in acute alcohol-attributable admissions and a 9.2% reduction in chronic alcohol-attributable admissions two years later.
Our domestic court, the Court of Session, found comprehensively in favour of our minimum unit pricing policy for alcohol in a judgment issued in May. The court recognised the overwhelming evidence supporting the legitimate aims of minimum unit pricing to reduce alcohol consumption, with a particular focus on reducing consumption by hazardous and harmful drinkers who experience so much of the alcohol-related harm we see in Scotland.
While the UK Government is not continuing with minimum pricing at the moment, it is supportive of the legality of the policy and are backing the Scottish Government in the judicial review process.
The responses from some European member states are part of an ongoing dialogue we have with the European Commission. Ireland, Estonia and Latvia have all voiced support.
This is about dealing with a very specific problem of alcohol abuse that we have in Scotland. We are confident that minimum unit pricing complies with EU law and that we can demonstrate that minimum unit pricing is justified on the basis of public health and social grounds and will continue to press the case for minimum pricing in the strongest possible terms.
The Scottish Government is not attempting to favour domestic goods over imports. We are not trying to restrict trade and all products will be treated the same. Minimum pricing is a health improvement policy.
Our policy will have virtually no impact on quality products like Scotch whisky, quality vodka and wines. And it will have virtually no impact on those who drink moderately.
The driving factor behind introducing a minimum unit price for alcohol is to improve public health in Scotland. I am confident that this measure will further enhance Scotland's status as a leader in public health.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article