THEY are trying to make us play the Name Game again.
Transport Scotland is asking the general public to vote for what the new bridge over the Forth should be called. This follows a consultation process by which a short leet of five names was chosen from 7000 submitted by the public.
Now you can vote between: Caledonia Bridge, Firth of Forth Crossing, Queensferry Crossing, Saltire Crossing, or the St Margaret's Crossing. So far, so exciting.
I would call it the Double Crossing, because the people of Scotland were not asked it they wanted to pay for a new bridge. The cost (before inflation and getting the estimate wrong) is £1.6billion. Which seems a lot money to have even more cars going from Fife to Edinburgh and vice-versa.
Could we not just have had the old bridge tarted up? Or launch a campaign to deter people from crossing the Forth? With big road signs asking: "Is your journey to Kirkcaldy really necessary?" or "Please turn back. Edinburgh is full."
They could extend the Edinburgh tram system all the way to the old bridge as a public transport alternative.
But work has already started on the £1.6billion project so we might as well choose a name. The Caledonia and Saltire suggestions are frankly stupid and need no further consideration. The St Margaret Crossing would inevitably be boycotted by certain football supporters' buses.
There is no write-in option on the Transport Scotland website poll. So I cannot vote for Another Bridge over the River: Why? Or the None of the Above Crossing. Or the You'll Have Had Your Bridge.
The obvious name which needed no consultation and no public vote is the New Forth Road Bridge.
Another eminently bin-able project is the search to find a new slogan to sell Glasgow. The city marketing bureau wants to replace the existing Glasgow: Style over Substance (although I may have got that wrong) in time for next year's Commonwealth Games.
The much-revered Glasgow's Miles Better could usefully be dusted down and recycled (no velodrome pun intended) for the 2014 sports extravaganza.
I recall another slogan which talked about putting the "go" into Glasgow. Let's leave the dear green place miles better.
But how about putting the "no" into Stornoway, the "lash" into Galashiels, and the definite article into Motherwell?
tom shields on ... A bridge too far
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article