Most people have no real idea of how the banking system and money actually works.
They fancifully believe the Government is in charge when the reality is that when the Government needs money it has to go cap in hand to the City and borrow from commercial banks and pay them interest in the same way as the general public.
The Bank of England has no bottomless reserve of funds into which the Government can dip to balance the books. It does, as a result of quantitative easing, have a massive amount of UK Government bonds which, considering the increasing national debt, have no real value. How the Bank of England (BofE) acquired these bonds is peculiar as it never had assets to do so. That the BofE can say to a commercial bank: "Give us some Government bonds and in return we will let you adjust your balance sheet", would sound suspiciously like fraud in any other environment.
The world financial collapse proved beyond doubt that fractional reserve banking, where non-existent capital is fed into a loan cycle which can only function if all debts are paid and nobody removes their assets, is in actuality a glorified Ponzi scheme. As in the case of Bernie Madoff, if private individuals use this mechanism they go to jail for a long time but if the system is run by and for the establishment it is given Government backing and those who operate it are feted and rewarded. The Libor scandal demonstrates they can help themselves to as much of the illegal profits as they want and remain immune from prosecution as long as the establishment gets its share.
It is testament to the apathetic nature of the UK electorate that, at a time of austerity with worse on the way, we meekly stand back while the government, by its inaction, is complicit by tolerating such openly corrupt behaviour. Despite almost daily revelations of new corrupt practices in the banking industry, the rich are still getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. The two facts are connected.
David J Crawford,
131 Shuna Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article