WITHIN the massive media coverage of hurricane Sandy as it battered the east coast of the United States of America, which must make the poor Caribbean victims of the same storm seem an irrelevance, one would be hard-pressed to find any mention of climate change ("Britons stranded as US counts cost of Sandy", The Herald, November 1).
Yet just recently, one of the largest re-insurance companies in the world, Munich Re, issued a report entitled Severe Weather in North America. In it it notes that weather-related disasters have quintupled over the last three decades.
Obviously many factors may have contributed to this trend, including an increase in the number of people living in flood-prone areas, yet this report, from a non-scientific organisation, chooses to focus on global warming as one of the major culprits by observing: "Climate change particularly affects formation of heatwaves, droughts, intense precipitation events, and in the long run most probably also tropical cyclone intensity."
Clearly, given the complexity of the climate and its associated weather systems, it would be scientifically illiterate to attribute a particular weather event to global warming. But the rise in global average temperature means warmer air and warmer oceans and simple hydrodynamics tells us that this implies increased water storage in the atmosphere, while simple thermodynamics tells us that the biosphere now stores much more energy than in the pre-industrial age. Sandy, in doing what cyclones do, merely gathered some of the extra water and energy to make itself into a superstorm.
As a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has firmly demonstrated, by warming the atmosphere mankind is "loading the dice" so that disastrous weather events become more common. Another Sandy is not 100 years away but perhaps as near as next year.
It is time the media, and politicians, exercised responsibility and began providing the public with the full facts on our changing climate.
Alan J Sangster,
37 Craigmount Terrace,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article