Not the spindly, vertiginous, Meccano-on-steroids contraptions that tower over building sites from Dundee to Dubai and which were seen swaying perilously over Manhattan this week as SuperStorm Sandy did its worst.
No, we mean the wetland-loving migratory birds whose long necks and legs have given those machines their name.
In particular, that flock of Siberian cranes which fell into formation alongside a motorised hang-glider drilling its way through the pure blue skies over Vladivostock one day in September. The hang-glider was piloted by a hard-faced, blue-eyed 60-year-old wearing a spotless white boiler suit – let's call him Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, because that's his name – who was none too pleased about the unwelcome attention as it was distracting from his latest He-Man media stunt. President Putin, you may recall, is very fond of being photographed (usually bare-chested) doing foolhardy things such as riding horses, swimming in freezing rivers, petting polar bears and accompanying himself on the piano while singing Blueberry Hill.
In fact the cranes proved so distracting as they buzzed the hang-glider the Prez was piloting that he aggravated an old injury and has barely been seen in public since. At least that's the claim as presented in Russian newspaper Vedomosti.
President Putin's spokesman, meanwhile, has countered the story through a Russian news agency. So is the whole thing just a web of rumour and disinformation spun by western intelligence agencies trying to making President Putin look stupid? Perhaps. Do we even know the cranes were real? There are photographs, of course, though did anyone check that they weren't actually remote-controlled cyborg cranes with "Made in Langley" stamped on the bottom?
Until we know the answer, give praise to the crane for doing what few other world leaders have managed and upstaging the bullish Russian leader – and in mid-air, too.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article