THE decision by the SNP's disciplinary panel yesterday to expel backbench MSP Bill Walker from the party was swift and just.
There can be no place in politics for someone with Walker's track record. Over four decades, from the 1960s to the 1990s, he was accused by three wives of cruelty and abuse.
One wife told this paper she was punched in the face and nearly hospitalised by Walker, while a teenage step-daughter told a court he had turned a saucepan inside-out by striking her with it.
Now that his actions have caught up with him, Walker should accept the SNP's vote to expel him and waive his right to appeal.
More importantly, he should use this moment to remove himself completely from public life.
For despite being kicked out of his party, he is still entitled to remain at Holyrood as an independent MSP for another four years and so collect some £230,000 in salary.
In that regard, his case echoes that of Labour's Eric Joyce, who recently admitted a drunken assault in a Commons bar, but remains an MP because he cannot be forced out of parliament. The examples of Walker and Joyce should make all parties reflect on whether elected politicians should be subject to recall procedures if they break fundamental bonds of trust with electors.
Zero Tolerance, the charity campaigning against domestic abuse, says Walker should do the "honorable thing" and stand down.
He owes it to the people of Dunfermline to quit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article