Today we publish on our website, heraldscotland.com, the controversial report by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) which casts doubt on both the fairness of the trial of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi and the guilty verdict it passed.
There is no shortage of parties eager to put on record their view that this report should be in the public domain.
The Crown Office has allowed the SCCRC to publish the report without fear of prosecution. The Scottish Government and the First Minister have strongly stated they want the report published. And the SCCRC has long been in favour of publication.
And yet it has remained secret for five years, until today.
There is a clear public interest in making the report available. The public has a right to know the nature of the SCCRC reservations and why it reached its conclusions.
Of course, publication of the report will not clear up the very many questions which remain unanswered in the wake of the Lockerbie atrocity.
As the Crown Office points out, the conviction can only be quashed in a court of law and there is at present no appeal in process.
But publication of the report inevitably makes the conviction seem less secure and casts doubt over the manner in which the Crown undertook the prosecution.
It also throws up interesting questions as to why the report has not been published before and about the role of the press in a free society.
One is the nature of data protection legislation, which has been continually cited as a block on disclosure. There are justified fears that this legislation is preventing the work of a free press.
The role of newspapers in publishing information contained in the SCCRC report and, today, publishing the report itself, is a strong argument against moves to limit the effectiveness of journalists being discussed in the wake of the Leveson inquiry into phone hacking. The media needs to make two points.
The first is that journalists who break the law should be prosecuted and punished in accordance with that law. The second is that a free press is essential to a functioning democracy. Without it we would not know of the MPs' expenses scandal; we would not know that the justifications for the war against Iraq were lies; we would not even have known about phone hacking itself.
And we would still be waiting, after five years of silence, to learn the exact nature of the doubts over the trial and conviction of the man accused of the biggest terrorist atrocity ever committed in this country.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article