UNDERWATER archaeology isn't a subject I'd given much thought to before Sunday evening, when a highly absorbing documentary on BBC2 took us back a few thousand years.
The subject was the ancient Greek city of Pavlopetri, which disappeared beneath the waters of the Aegean and remained undetected until 1967.
An international team led by underwater archaeologist Dr Jon Henderson donned their wetsuits and explored the drowned site; where you and I would have struggled to see anything other than rocks and sand, they were able to trace the outlines of buildings.
Numerous shards of ancient pottery were retrieved, bagged and photographed, and gradually a detailed picture was built up of this once-thriving trading ports.
The fascination in this hour-long documentary lay in the way that the pottery and the building foundations, coupled with clues from other Bronze Age town plans, were used to shed light on how the inhabitants lived, worked and died.
Here and there, sombre little details seeped out, such as the fact that children were often buried, in tiny graves, on the household premises.
At night-time, a robotic survey torpedo swept the entire site, its twin cameras taking photographs three times per second. This allowed a stone-by-stone 3D image of the drowned city to be etched; Dr Henderson, barely able to contain his enthusiasm, said the robotic device would change underwater archaeology forever.
A visual-effects team digested all the information and took series of photographs to devise a CGI sequence which showed how Pavlopetri would have looked at its peak, at around 1600 BC, long before the first of three crippling earthquakes, the first of which is thought to have occurred around 1000 BC.
This was submerged history, brought back to life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article