We went to the Glasgow Grand Ole Opry.
Arguably the biggest country music club in Britain, I hadn’t seen the old girl in a while. She hasn’t changed much. Maybe a little scuffed around the edges, but as friendly, as charismatic and eccentric, as she ever was.
We saw great bands, we danced and drank whisky at frontier town prices amid cowboy hats and jackets with fringes, big belt buckles and western aliases. Glaswegian voices bantered under the flag of the Lone Star State. I wore a bootlace tie.
Is this really Glasgow? Is it escapism? Is it some intoxication still from some night when Glasgow folk sang the songs of Merle Haggard? All of the above?
Who knows? I’d wager though, that the regulars don’t give a damn what you think. Just like Glasgow doesn’t give a damn what the rest of Scotland thinks. For we are not like Scotland. We know this and raise a glass to the difference, to the maverick and the outlaw, to the character that would not conform.
For the Glasgow Opry at large, imagination is king and romance more important than fact.
The Opry gives a keek at a real Glasgow: garrulous and beaming and offering a light. There’s another real Glasgow, of course: one expressing allegiance to flags less distant than those of the American South, that somehow still cares about the history of Ireland and of Dutch kings. For them, though, imagination is dead and malice more important than love.
I don’t know the reason for the interest in Americana at the Opry. I don’t really care. But I know this: the sight of the Dixie flag on Paisley Road West is preferable to the sight of Union Jacks and Irish Tricolours. It’s just a bit more Glaswegian.
Keep it country, y’all.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article