Pioneer of ultrasound scans;
Born: November 6, 1927; Died: May 23, 2011.
PROFESSOR John MacVicar, who has died aged 83, helped transform the management of pregnancy and the treatment of gynaecological conditions with his pioneering research into the use of ultrasound scans.
As a young obstetrician in the 1950s, he joined a small team at Glasgow’s Western Infirmary who were trying to adapt sonar technology, originally used during the war to track enemy submarines, so that it could be applied to medical diagnostics.
Together with Professor Ian Donald, Regius Professor of Midwifery at Glasgow University, and 23-year-old engineer Tom Brown, from the Glasgow firm of Kelvin Hughes, Dr MacVicar, as he was at the time, worked tirelessly to develop a prototype medical scanner by adapting an ultrasonic metal flaw detector and even using Meccano parts and an old bedside table.
In June 1958, the trio published a landmark paper in The Lancet: Investigation of Abdominal Masses by Pulsed Ultrasound. It presented data on 100 patients and reported how scanning had been used to detect and diagnose growths in the abdomen, being able to differentiate between cysts, fibroids and other intra-abdominal masses.
The paper introduced a new diagnostic science that would influence the future of obstetrics and gynaecology and, later, many other branches of medicine and surgery. In 1963 the same three Glasgow researchers published a paper in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology on the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of early pregnancy and its complications.
Dr MacVicar, who had been registrar in Ian Donald’s professorial department when he was co-opted onto the team, was dedicated to the research work. As an obstetrician operating in the fledgling NHS, he was acutely aware that women, particularly those from poorer backgrounds, had been given no option but to simply put up with gynaecological problems for years. Now, with ultrasound, there was a chance to do something about it.
With Mr Brown there to build the machine, it was left to Dr MacVicar to conduct the clinical trials. Initially, it was lumps of meat which were scanned, comparing the results with scans of tissue, such as cysts, which had been removed from bodies.
He would experiment into the night, often ending up soaking wet. Sonar had originally been used for detecting submarines and it was some time before the team realised that the experiments did not have to be conducted under water.
In 2008, celebrating the 50th anniversary of the publication of the paper in The Lancet, Prof MacVicar said: “It was rather marvellous to see inside the body. We could see the baby moving. It was there and then it shifted.”
Born in the village of Southend on the Mull of Kintyre, John MacVicar was a son of the manse. His brother was the well-known Scottish author Angus MacVicar. He was educated at school in Campbelltown before going on to study medicine at Glasgow University.
After graduation and training he chose to specialise in obstetrics and joined Prof Donald as registrar in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at the Western Infirmary and Royal Maternity Hospital in 1956.
He later became lecturer and senior lecturer in Ob/gyn at Glasgow University. His long and distinguished professional connection to the city ended in 1974 when he accepted the post of Foundation Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaeocology at Leicester University. Passionate about clinical care and teaching, he was a modest man who rarely talked to colleagues about his pioneering research work. He retired in 1992 but continued to live in Leicester until his death.
Prof MacVicar was a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of Glasgow and a Fellow of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. He is survived by his wife Esme, children Marsali, Rona, Alan and Cath, and grandchildren Sam, Emily, Ailie, Kirsty and Cameron.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article