Viewers have all made the same comment after Chris McCausland's dance on on Saturday (November 16) night as Strictly Come Dancing returned to Blackpool.
Comedian McCausland performed a classical American smooth routine with professional dance partner Dianne Buswell to the track Jump by Paul Anka.
It was revealed following their routine they were the 100th Strictly couple to perform in the Blackpool Tower Ballroom.
The dance landed the pair their highest score of the series so far - 37 which included two 10s from Anton Du Beke and head judge Shirley Ballas.
Ballas told McCausland he has the “best feet I’ve seen in a long time” and the comedian “didn’t miss a beat”.
While Du Beke added: "If anyone can beat that tonight, I’d be amazed."
Strictly viewers all say same thing about Chris McCausland dance
But it seems not everyone agreed with the judges scores for McCausland's dance, with viewers taking to Reddit saying that although it was "so good" it shouldn't have scored 10s.
All the Strictly Come Daning winners over the years
One person commented: "Definitely a 9 dance not quite a 10 dance but still good."
Another added: "That's Shirley and Anton giving 10s to everyone then. It was so so good.. but it wasn't 10."
RECOMMENDED READING:
- Strictly star Chris McCausland says there are 'low expectations' of disabled people
- The reason why Strictly has a Blackpool Tower Ballroom episode every series
- Strictly Come Dancing confirms Christmas special as first celebrity announced
A third Reddit user said: "10s sorry did I watch something else no more than a 7/8 surely."
While this person posted: "A 10? Bit high but happy for him."
The Pet Shop Boys opened the Blackpool special performing a medley of their songs including It's a Sin, while the professional dancers and celebrities performed an all in group dance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here