Stamp Duty changes for second homes will come into force tomorrow, following Rachel Reeves' announcement in the autumn budget.
In England and Northern Ireland, the higher rate of stamp duty is equivalent to an extra five percentage points on top of standard rates.
Terry Fisher, chief executive of We Buy Any Home, has described it as a shock to many sellers.
"Rachel Reeves’ decision to raise Capital Gains Tax for those selling second homes will come as a shock to many property owners who were already feeling the pinch," he says.
"This increase could discourage people from selling their second properties, especially in areas where buy-to-let investments and second homes make up a significant part of the housing market. It’s likely we’ll see a reduced flow of these properties onto the market, which could limit options for buyers looking to enter the property ladder."
This could have an impact on the number of rental properties available, forcing rents up, as he explains: "For smaller landlords, especially those relying on a few properties for income, the raised Capital Gains Tax could force a hard decision between selling now and facing a steep tax bill or holding onto properties longer than planned. We may see more landlords holding off from selling, which in turn could reduce rental availability. For renters already coping with tight supply, this change may mean even fewer options and increased rents."
Angharad Truman, ARLA Propertymark President agrees: “We continue to see a growing disparity in the number of private rented homes available against a backdrop of increasing demand from tenants. Therefore, it is disappointing to see that the UK Government did not address this fundamental issue in its autumn budget and instead has announced yet another blow for landlords by increasing Stamp Duty on second homes.
“The private rented sector plays a crucial role in housing the nation with over 4.6 million homes in England alone, therefore it is imperative that the UK Government does not continue to push landlords out of the market."
There have also been concerns about the decision not to continue Stamp Duty relief extension. The biggest difference is that the threshold at which stamp duty must be paid will go back to its previous level of £125,000, rather than the more generous £250,000.
As a result, house movers will have to pay stamp duty on a greater portion of their home’s value.
John Fraser-Tucker, Head of Mortgages at broker Mojo Mortgages, said: "The failure to extend the Stamp Duty relief beyond 31st March 2025 is incredibly disappointing for aspiring homeowners.
"With over a third (36%) of first-time buyers already seeking financial support from family, this additional cost could push homeownership even further out of reach for many.
"For an average-priced property (£328,036), first-time buyers will now face an extra £3,901 in upfront costs. This change could force many to delay their dreams of homeownership.”
He also voiced disappointment that the proposed Freedom to Buy scheme had not yet been put in place.
"This innovative proposal was designed to ease the path to homeownership by allowing mortgage lenders to accept lower deposits, with the government providing a safety net in case first-time buyers encountered financial difficulties," says John.
"The scheme's premise was simple yet potentially transformative: the government would step in to repay a portion of the mortgage lender's potential losses in the event of repossession.
"In today's housing market, where the average age of first-time buyers has crept up to 33 years and 8 months old, many young people are watching their dreams of homeownership slip further out of reach. The Freedom to Buy scheme offered a glimmer of hope, particularly for those struggling to save substantial deposits in high-demand areas.
"However, the lack of action on this scheme represents a missed opportunity to address the growing generational divide in property ownership and is likely to leave many feeling let down and uncertain about their chances of owning a home."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here