Nine out of ten frustrated green boffins are threatening to quit their jobs with hypocritical companies if they're not supported in hitting lofty climate targets.
A whopping 88% of sustainability workers and managers responsible for Net Zero work said they'd leave if they believed companies were merely paying lip service to the commitment.
Those quizzed in the survey by Equity Energies, part of DCC plc, cited organisational inaction and 'persistent barriers' to progress in slashing greenhouse gas emissions.
Barriers ranked as most impactful include the scaling back of emission targets (36%), lack of prioritisation compared to other organisational initiatives (33%) and internal politics or lack of cohesive decision-making (35%).
More than three-quarters (77%) of those surveyed bemoaned micromanaging and being hounded to demonstrate results - claiming it's negatively impacting their job satisfaction and fulfilment.
The study, 'Carbon Admissions: we don’t know what we don’t know', explores attitudes regarding Net Zero progress across hospitality, manufacturing, local authority organisations and private healthcare.
The UK government has committed to Net Zero by 2050 - a project meaning that the total greenhouse gas emissions would be equal to emissions removed from the atmosphere, with the aim of limiting global warming and climate change.
There appears to be great support in reaching Net Zero with 94% of organisations saying it's a priority within their organisation compared to other initiatives.
There are also high levels of optimism and confidence reported by those tasked with advancing Net Zero, with 92% saying they were confident in their ability to roll-out their plans.
Similarly, 94% said they're confident key stakeholders and decision-makers within their organisation have sufficient knowledge of Net Zero and how to get there.
In addition, 91% feel confident in their own knowledge of Net Zero and how to achieve it, while 89% say they are confident in the ability of their organisation to be Net Zero.
Despite such confidence, the research suggests there's a disconnect between the theory and reality of reaching the climate targets by 2050.
Gaps in expertise were cited as a concern, with nearly all respondents (98%) admitting they lack knowledge in the fundamental processes required to do their work.
The areas of greatest concern relating to lack of knowledge include monitoring and measurement (19%), target setting (19%), and data and insights (16%).
Other concerns were Net Zero pathway design and creation (16%) and execution of efficiency measures / technologies (12%).
This is compounded by almost half (45%) of businesses citing speed and efficiency of decision-making around sustainability and Net Zero as 'slow' within their organisations.
More information can be found by visiting www.equityenergies.com/carbonadmissions.
Ryan O'Neill, Chief Strategy Officer of Equity Energies, said: "All progress is progress when it comes to Net Zero.
"The commitment, passion and confidence within UK organisations to get there is to be commended and celebrated.
"But to know where we're going, we must know where we're starting from - both organisationally and in our own personal knowledge and understanding.
"We don't know what we don't know, and that has been demonstrated through this research, but it's okay not to have all the answers when it comes to Net Zero.
"Asking questions is the first step to begin change and unlock progress and that's why we've launched our Carbon Admissions campaign to encourage more transparency and honesty on what we don't know.
"Also to inspire more open conversations within UK organisations on the questions they have relating to how to reach Net Zero.
"By doing so, we can widen access to the shared experiences, information, intelligence and expertise that can collectively help each other on the next step to a better tomorrow."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel