A new packaging tax to fund recycling will push up the price of many products, such as beer, soft drinks and small appliances such as kettles, some UK firms have warned.
This is due to the extended producer responsibility (EPR) scheme which comes into effect next year.
As part of the scheme, it will shift the cost of household recycling from councils back on to the companies using the packaging.
In August, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) published its “first estimate” of the rates to be charged for each tonne of material, giving companies a price range from the lowest to the highest.
Pev Manners, the managing director of the cordial maker Belvoir Farm, said the preliminary cost for glass in the EPR for packaging was “nuts”, The Guardian reports.
He added that the rate for glass was “spectacularly high”, spanning £130 to £330 a tonne.
Based on the highest cost scenario covering the fees would add 25p – the equivalent of a 10% price increase – to a bottle of its elderflower cordial.
Manner said: "Last year, we turned over £21m and made £900,000 profit. My finance director estimates this tax will cost us £850,000 next year, so 100% of our profits.”
In a statement, Defra said the EPR was a “vital first step in cracking down on waste as we move towards a circular economy, and we have always been clear these fees are our initial estimates … We are continuing to meet with the glass industry to discuss more workable approaches, including for how we calculate the cost of glass.”
What other industries would be affected?
In a joint letter the British Beer and Pub Association, Independent Family Brewers of Britain, Campaign for Real Ale, and Society of Independent Brewers and Associates, suggested it would put between 3p and 7p on each of the 3.2bn bottles of beer sold in the UK each year.
Meanwhile, Ian Bray, the chief executive of Fentimans, said: "At the high end of their [glass] cost estimate it was a number which was greater than my profit for the year,” he said, having worked out it would add 50p to a 750ml bottle of its soft drinks.
Glass is hit hard because it is heavy and Defra is using weight as a key metric but as talks with industry continue Bray is more optimistic.
@uktoday_ Here are the UK tax codes explained and how to check your tax code #uknews #uktax #taxcode #uknewsheadlines ♬ original sound - UKToday 🇬🇧 Newsquest
“If they base it on volume rather than weight, then that will probably reduce the cost for glass by about a third, which starts to become more reasonable,” he said.
Meanwhile, the British Home Enhancement Trade Association, which represents DIY, garden, housewares and small electricals suppliers, said the “EPR tax will lead to price hikes across all manner of consumer goods”.
Recommended reading:
- Full list of all the discontinued Coca-Cola drinks in the UK
- Coca-Cola 'sorry for any disappointment' as 2 of the 'best Cokes' are discontinued
- Nestle issues update on return of popular cereal that was discontinued twice
Will Jones, its chief operating officer, said: “Producers will be unable to absorb these costs and will either have to pass them up the supply chain to retailers and ultimately consumers, adding to pressure on inflation, or implement damaging cost cutting measures in their business potentially leading to job losses.”
Discussing the EPR, Lee Marshall, policy and external affairs director at the Chartered Institution of Wastes Management said it should help reduce the “environmental burden of used packaging and support increased collection and recycling".
He added: "The system should mean packaging is designed to be more easily recycled, more of it is collected for recycling and that producers, rather than local authorities, fund all of this."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel